Amazoniac
Member
A more reasonable scenario is that those 10 kg of extra body fat are 30% unsaturated (perhaps still inflated), most of it being linoleate (salt form of linoleic acid).
Not all is linoleic acid, some are more unstable, so to be conservative: 0.8*30 = 25 IU a day for the next years to secure that.
I don't know how much of the fat constitution other than adipose tissue contributes to an increased need, but it must not be a lot since the majority of toxic fats should be stored in safer places (Dinkov, 2016).
I forgot to credit Loy (previous post) for the PUFA nomenclature, he's also the author of publications (a) et (b). This guy is another ultra-pimp. And now to redeem myself with class, he wrote a chapter in a book named 'Free Radicals in PBoyology (vol. 4)', the title ist:
(h) CHAPTER 9 - Vitamin E and Lipid Antioxidants in Free-Radical-Initiated Reactions
I don't agree with the last two interpretations by Zeus here because the author implies that including vegetation might (if anything) increase vit E intakes, and not make it worse, but that alone is not enough to compensate for the overall unnatural PUFA ingestion. Regarding needing 36-60 mg a day, that's because it was based on usual polyunsaturated oils consumption in people's diet, that's definitely decreased the more people lower their consumption. It's difficult to standardize these recommendations. If the diet is already consistenly low in PUFA, what will dictate the requirements the most is the stored amount from past years and perhaps stress levels.
Ps.: I'm trying to have a clearer picture of all this, if you spot the mistakes, please let me know.
(b) "A recommendation of 0.6 IU vitamin E activity/g linoleate in 100 g adipose tissue fatty acids is tentatively suggested."
Not all is linoleic acid, some are more unstable, so to be conservative: 0.8*30 = 25 IU a day for the next years to secure that.
I don't know how much of the fat constitution other than adipose tissue contributes to an increased need, but it must not be a lot since the majority of toxic fats should be stored in safer places (Dinkov, 2016).
I forgot to credit Loy (previous post) for the PUFA nomenclature, he's also the author of publications (a) et (b). This guy is another ultra-pimp. And now to redeem myself with class, he wrote a chapter in a book named 'Free Radicals in PBoyology (vol. 4)', the title ist:
(h) CHAPTER 9 - Vitamin E and Lipid Antioxidants in Free-Radical-Initiated Reactions
In summary:
- Adipose tissue might not reflect diet composition after 6 years. They tried to track gurus for 14 years and the accumulation never seemed to reflect the diet composition precisely at any time.
- The estimated fat composition turnoowa rate matches those that we've been discussing.
- Adipose tissue tends to reflect the proportion of fat saturation/unsaturation in the diet more so than the amount; sounds suspicious, but all in all a very low-fat diet might not guarantee anything and might be worse than a higher-fat diet if most of its composition is unsaturated. This also matches what I read from Raj and Johannes of the Selyes:
- The usual composition of linoleate in adipose tissue is 10%.
- Absorption can be decreased from 80-50%, to 50-20%, then to 5% when intakes are 0.04 mg (tut), 20 mg (30 IU), and 200 mg (300 IU) a day respectively. One more point in favor of ingestion.
- "A vitamin E deficiency is not seen in any normal mixed diet, but the progressive increase in PUFA content of the North American diet has lead to concern in the future." Not that more can't be better, but this is a statement made by a competent vitamin E researcher. The optimal requirements might not be as high as our needs to feel safe.
I highly recommend reading his writings:
<stop eating spaces>- Adipose tissue might not reflect diet composition after 6 years. They tried to track gurus for 14 years and the accumulation never seemed to reflect the diet composition precisely at any time.
- The estimated fat composition turnoowa rate matches those that we've been discussing.
- Adipose tissue tends to reflect the proportion of fat saturation/unsaturation in the diet more so than the amount; sounds suspicious, but all in all a very low-fat diet might not guarantee anything and might be worse than a higher-fat diet if most of its composition is unsaturated. This also matches what I read from Raj and Johannes of the Selyes:
Ray Peat
"Hans Selye did experiments studying the type of lesion in the heart produced by rapeseed oil, and he found that it was the linoleic acid in it, which is still in it. They took out the peculiar unusual fatty acid but the essential fatty acid linoleic acid is heart toxic. Hans Selye showed that if you added cocoa butter, a highly saturated stearic acid to the rapeseed oil, it no longer causes the death of the heart cells."
<stop eating spaces>"Hans Selye did experiments studying the type of lesion in the heart produced by rapeseed oil, and he found that it was the linoleic acid in it, which is still in it. They took out the peculiar unusual fatty acid but the essential fatty acid linoleic acid is heart toxic. Hans Selye showed that if you added cocoa butter, a highly saturated stearic acid to the rapeseed oil, it no longer causes the death of the heart cells."
- The usual composition of linoleate in adipose tissue is 10%.
- Absorption can be decreased from 80-50%, to 50-20%, then to 5% when intakes are 0.04 mg (tut), 20 mg (30 IU), and 200 mg (300 IU) a day respectively. One more point in favor of ingestion.
- "A vitamin E deficiency is not seen in any normal mixed diet, but the progressive increase in PUFA content of the North American diet has lead to concern in the future." Not that more can't be better, but this is a statement made by a competent vitamin E researcher. The optimal requirements might not be as high as our needs to feel safe.
I highly recommend reading his writings:
I don't agree with the last two interpretations by Zeus here because the author implies that including vegetation might (if anything) increase vit E intakes, and not make it worse, but that alone is not enough to compensate for the overall unnatural PUFA ingestion. Regarding needing 36-60 mg a day, that's because it was based on usual polyunsaturated oils consumption in people's diet, that's definitely decreased the more people lower their consumption. It's difficult to standardize these recommendations. If the diet is already consistenly low in PUFA, what will dictate the requirements the most is the stored amount from past years and perhaps stress levels.
Ps.: I'm trying to have a clearer picture of all this, if you spot the mistakes, please let me know.
Last edited: